Ask a Librarian

Threre are lots of ways to contact a librarian. Choose what works best for you.

HOURS TODAY

10:00 am - Closed

Reference Desk

CONTACT US BY PHONE

(802) 656-2022

Voice

(802) 503-1703

Text

MAKE AN APPOINTMENT OR EMAIL A QUESTION

Schedule an Appointment

Meet with a librarian or subject specialist for in-depth help.

Email a Librarian

Submit a question for reply by e-mail.

WANT TO TALK TO SOMEONE RIGHT AWAY?

Library Hours for Saturday, May 4th

All of the hours for today can be found below. We look forward to seeing you in the library.
HOURS TODAY
10:00 am - 5:30 pm
MAIN LIBRARY

SEE ALL LIBRARY HOURS
WITHIN HOWE LIBRARY

MapsM-Th by appointment, email govdocs@uvm.edu

Media Services1:00 pm - 5:00 pm

Reference Desk10:00 am - Closed

OTHER DEPARTMENTS

Special CollectionsClosed

Dana Health Sciences Library10:00 am - 6:00 pm

 

CATQuest

Search the UVM Libraries' collections

UVM Theses and Dissertations

Browse by Department
Format:
Print
Author:
Ciarimboli, Kathy
Dept./Program:
Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources
Year:
2004
Degree:
M.S.
Abstract:
Abiotic and biotic surrogates may facilitate the establishment of conservation priorities over broad spatial scales if they can approximate the distribution of biological diversity. I explored the utility of Landscape Diversity Units (LDUs), designed to describe bedrock geology, surficial geology, elevation, and landform on a 30-m grid across Vermont, as a surrogate for biological diversity in each of three taxa: vascular plants, birds, and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae); I also assessed the utility of each taxon as a surrogate for the other. Surveys for plants and birds were conducted in 53 plots, and ground beetles were sampled in a subset of these (n=21). Specifically, I examined correspondence across plots between LDUs and species assemblages in each taxon. I also examined correspondence among assemblages of taxa. In addition, I explored diversity relationships at the plot level (20.25 ha) between landscape variables and species, as well as among taxa.
Moderate levels of correspondence were found between LDUs and species assemblages; plots that were similar in composition of LDUs also tended to have similar biotic communities. Plants were most strongly associated with LDUs, followed by birds, and then ground beetles. Relationships at the plot level between various indices of abiotic and species diversity varied, but were generally weak; the magnitude and significance depended on which diversity metric and taxon were used in the analysis. Species diversity and composition among all three taxa were moderately correlated across the study area, suggesting that these taxa may serve as reasonable surrogates for one another. These results demonstrate that abiotic and biotic surrogates provide a general estimation of the distribution of diversity, suggesting that they can successfully be applied in a coarse-filter approach to conservation planning.