Ask a Librarian

Threre are lots of ways to contact a librarian. Choose what works best for you.

HOURS TODAY

10:00 am - 4:00 pm

Reference Desk

CONTACT US BY PHONE

(802) 656-2022

Voice

(802) 503-1703

Text

MAKE AN APPOINTMENT OR EMAIL A QUESTION

Schedule an Appointment

Meet with a librarian or subject specialist for in-depth help.

Email a Librarian

Submit a question for reply by e-mail.

WANT TO TALK TO SOMEONE RIGHT AWAY?

Library Hours for Thursday, November 21st

All of the hours for today can be found below. We look forward to seeing you in the library.
HOURS TODAY
8:00 am - 12:00 am
MAIN LIBRARY

SEE ALL LIBRARY HOURS
WITHIN HOWE LIBRARY

MapsM-Th by appointment, email govdocs@uvm.edu

Media Services8:00 am - 7:00 pm

Reference Desk10:00 am - 4:00 pm

OTHER DEPARTMENTS

Special Collections10:00 am - 6:00 pm

Dana Health Sciences Library7:30 am - 11:00 pm

 

CATQuest

Search the UVM Libraries' collections

UVM Theses and Dissertations

Browse by Department
Format:
Online
Author:
Melbostad, Heidi S.
Dept./Program:
Psychology
Year:
2020
Degree:
Ph. D.
Abstract:
Background: In the BCII randomized clinical trial, women receiving medication for opioid use disorder (OUD) and at risk of unintended pregnancy who received contraceptive services interventions co-located with an OUD treatment facility had significantly higher rates of prescription contraceptive use than those who received usual care. To support informed decision-making about using these interventions in community-based settings, I conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to determine the costs and health benefits associated with these interventions. Methods: I used the standard practice of calculating incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) between the trial conditions (i.e., usual care, contraceptive services, and contraceptive services + incentives) and derived the estimated societal cost of an unintended pregnancy for women with OUD to assess cost-effectiveness, from a societal perspective. Results: ICERs (95% confidence intervals) were $15,223 ($8,155-$28,323) for contraceptive services vs. usual care, $13,852 ($10,298-$20,065) for contraceptive services + incentives vs. usual care, and $12,225 ($5,273-$63,725) for contraceptive services + incentives vs. contraceptive services, per unintended pregnancy averted. Based on an estimated unintended pregnancy cost of $85,122, each dollar invested in contraceptive services vs. usual care yields $5.59 in societal cost savings and $6.14 for contraceptive services + incentives vs. usual care. Every dollar spent using incentives with contraceptive services yields $6.96 in societal cost savings vs. contraceptive services with no incentives. Discussion: The present study is the first rigorous economic evaluation of novel contraceptive services interventions for women with substance use disorders. Both interventions are highly cost-effective strategies to reduce the risk of unintended pregnancy for women in this population compared to usual care and yield substantial societal cost savings, but the most efficacious and cost-effective outcomes were achieved by combining contraceptive services with incentives.