Ask a Librarian

Threre are lots of ways to contact a librarian. Choose what works best for you.

HOURS TODAY

10:00 am - 4:00 pm

Reference Desk

CONTACT US BY PHONE

(802) 656-2022

Voice

(802) 503-1703

Text

MAKE AN APPOINTMENT OR EMAIL A QUESTION

Schedule an Appointment

Meet with a librarian or subject specialist for in-depth help.

Email a Librarian

Submit a question for reply by e-mail.

WANT TO TALK TO SOMEONE RIGHT AWAY?

Library Hours for Thursday, November 21st

All of the hours for today can be found below. We look forward to seeing you in the library.
HOURS TODAY
8:00 am - 12:00 am
MAIN LIBRARY

SEE ALL LIBRARY HOURS
WITHIN HOWE LIBRARY

MapsM-Th by appointment, email govdocs@uvm.edu

Media Services8:00 am - 7:00 pm

Reference Desk10:00 am - 4:00 pm

OTHER DEPARTMENTS

Special Collections10:00 am - 6:00 pm

Dana Health Sciences Library7:30 am - 11:00 pm

 

CATQuest

Search the UVM Libraries' collections

UVM Theses and Dissertations

Browse by Department
Format:
Print
Author:
Crow, Sarah
Dept./Program:
Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources
Year:
2008
Degree:
M.S.
Abstract:
For community-based forestry (CBF) initiatives in the United States, the decision to pursue forest certification represents a complex blend of both costs and benefits. Becoming certified can be challenging for rural CBF initiatives and economic returns for these efforts remain inconsistent. Given this divergence, why do CBF initiatives become certified? This thesis explores the motivations for forest certifications among CBF initiatives in Vermont, what they hope to achieve, and the benefits they realize as a result. Data were collected through 27 interviews with representatives of 18 organizations in Vermont, including all 13 certified organizations engaged in CBF and an additional five uncertified CBF efforts. Most groups were motivated to pursue certification largely for non-economic reasons including existing working relationships, value alignment, credibility and image.
Representatives of CBF initiatives felt that they largely achieved those goals. Economic benefits, such as green premium, were generally not primary motivations for participation and they were attained in only a few cases. Technical issues, such as achieving certification requirements, were a concern for many informants, and for some, the efforts of facilitating organizations and group certification procedures helped mitigate these issues. Generally, most certified informants were satisfied with the decision to become certified and felt that at least for now, certification was worth the extra effort and expense because it supported their organizational goals. In addition, this study highlights the role of facilitating organizations, external fknding and scale-sensitive certification options in helping community-based forestry efforts to engage in forest certification.