Ask a Librarian

Threre are lots of ways to contact a librarian. Choose what works best for you.

HOURS TODAY

10:00 am - 4:00 pm

Reference Desk

CONTACT US BY PHONE

(802) 656-2022

Voice

(802) 503-1703

Text

MAKE AN APPOINTMENT OR EMAIL A QUESTION

Schedule an Appointment

Meet with a librarian or subject specialist for in-depth help.

Email a Librarian

Submit a question for reply by e-mail.

WANT TO TALK TO SOMEONE RIGHT AWAY?

Library Hours for Thursday, November 21st

All of the hours for today can be found below. We look forward to seeing you in the library.
HOURS TODAY
8:00 am - 12:00 am
MAIN LIBRARY

SEE ALL LIBRARY HOURS
WITHIN HOWE LIBRARY

MapsM-Th by appointment, email govdocs@uvm.edu

Media Services8:00 am - 7:00 pm

Reference Desk10:00 am - 4:00 pm

OTHER DEPARTMENTS

Special Collections10:00 am - 6:00 pm

Dana Health Sciences Library7:30 am - 11:00 pm

 

CATQuest

Search the UVM Libraries' collections

UVM Theses and Dissertations

Browse by Department
Format:
Print
Author:
Clark, Jeremy M.
Dept./Program:
Wildlife and Fisheries Biology Program
Year:
2006
Degree:
M.S.
Abstract:
Ecological Land Units (ELUs), composed of elevation, bedrock geology, and landforms, can provide predictive estimates of forest type and bird species distributions and inform conservation management decisions. For three watersheds (622,800-ha) in northeastern Vermont and New Hampshire, ELUs were aggregated into physiographic groups, then validated with field surveys. Predictions of forest type were based on these physiographic groups. I based predictions of bird species occurrence on habitat associations with predicted forest type. For validation, I selected 81 9-ha sites to survey for dominant forest type and forest bird species. The overall kappa value (0.50) for forest type classification indicated moderate predictive capability for physiographic groups. The observed occurrence of each bird species in all forest types allowed calculation of detectability and site occupancy estimates. Logistic regression of bird observations provided an estimate of species occurrence for each forest type. These results provided parameters to set conservation targets for reserve design using physiographic groups and predicted bird species. Two watersheds in northern New Hampshire and western Maine, totaling almost 700,000 ha, were selected as models for conservation reserve planning. I used C-Plan software to compute efficient solutions for conservation targets based on the goal of protecting the diversity of abiotic physiographic groups and potential habitat for bird species. The most satisfying reserve solution required an additional 16,912 ha to protect the diversity of physiographic groups and 14,164 to 28,236 ha of potential bird habitat per species while also reserving land for intensive forest management. Exclusion of areas for continued forest management was compatible with expansion of the current conserved lands to develop a reserve network.