Ask a Librarian

Threre are lots of ways to contact a librarian. Choose what works best for you.

HOURS TODAY

11:00 am - 3:00 pm

Reference Desk

CONTACT US BY PHONE

(802) 656-2022

Voice

(802) 503-1703

Text

MAKE AN APPOINTMENT OR EMAIL A QUESTION

Schedule an Appointment

Meet with a librarian or subject specialist for in-depth help.

Email a Librarian

Submit a question for reply by e-mail.

WANT TO TALK TO SOMEONE RIGHT AWAY?

Library Hours for Friday, April 26th

All of the hours for today can be found below. We look forward to seeing you in the library.
HOURS TODAY
8:00 am - 6:00 pm
MAIN LIBRARY

SEE ALL LIBRARY HOURS
WITHIN HOWE LIBRARY

MapsM-Th by appointment, email govdocs@uvm.edu

Media Services8:00 am - 4:30 pm

Reference Desk11:00 am - 3:00 pm

OTHER DEPARTMENTS

Special Collections10:00 am - 5:00 pm

Dana Health Sciences Library7:30 am - 6:00 pm

 

CATQuest

Search the UVM Libraries' collections

UVM Theses and Dissertations

Browse by Department
Format:
Print
Author:
Lefever, Danica W.
Dept./Program:
Civil and Environmental Engineering
Year:
2006
Degree:
MS
Abstract:
Streambank retreat (SBR) is a complex process that is both temporally and spatially variable. Many attempts have been made to evaluate the extent of SBR through the use of streambank stability models and, in the State of Vermont, Rapid Geomorphic Assessments (RGAs). It is important to be able to identify stream reaches that are most susceptible to SBR in order to mitigate sediment and nutrient inputs to the stream from eroded streambank material. Bank retreat was measured using repeated cross-section surveys over three years for 8 sites and 15 cross-sections along the LaPlatte River and Lewis Creek in the Champlain Valley of Vermont, USA. The measured SBR rates were compared to results of two bank stability models, the Bank Stability Model (BSM) and SLOPEIW, as well as the resulting RGA scores based on the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources' protocols.
The SBR rates ranged from -0.15 to 0.43 m/yr, and geomorphic conditions ranged from fair (0.6) to reference condition (0.9; based on a scale from 0.0 to 1.0). RGA scores were not well correlated with measured rates of SBR. In addition, only the Factor of Safety (Fs) from the BSM model correlated moderately well with measured rates of SBR (correlation coefficient = 0.51; p = 0.05). The RGA scores did, however, correlate with the modeled Fs values, suggesting that the methods are comparable, but neither predicts rates of bank retreat well. Additional tools are needed to identify streambanks in need of mitigation measures to limit sediment and nutrient inputs.