Ask a Librarian

Threre are lots of ways to contact a librarian. Choose what works best for you.

HOURS TODAY

Closed

Reference Desk

CONTACT US BY PHONE

(802) 656-2022

Voice

(802) 503-1703

Text

MAKE AN APPOINTMENT OR EMAIL A QUESTION

Schedule an Appointment

Meet with a librarian or subject specialist for in-depth help.

Email a Librarian

Submit a question for reply by e-mail.

WANT TO TALK TO SOMEONE RIGHT AWAY?

Library Hours for Saturday, April 1st

All of the hours for today can be found below. We look forward to seeing you in the library.
HOURS TODAY
10:00 am - 5:30 pm
MAIN LIBRARY

SEE ALL LIBRARY HOURS
WITHIN HOWE LIBRARY

MapsClosed

Media Services1:00 pm - 5:00 pm

Reference DeskClosed

OTHER DEPARTMENTS

Special CollectionsClosed

Dana Health Sciences Library10:00 am - 6:00 pm

 

CATQuest

Search the UVM Libraries' collections

UVM Theses and Dissertations

Browse by Department
Format:
Online
Author:
Gonzalez, Johnny
Dept./Program:
Physics
Year:
2022
Degree:
M.S.
Abstract:
The pedagogical approach of the flipped classroom with an active learning model shows great benefit for all students in many disciplines. This study explored the possibility that certain subsets of students may have varying benefits from this model. In this study, we used survey questions to categorize students and analysis of the Forced Concept Inventory (FCI) scores, including normalized gain (NG), to measure learning improvement. In particular, we used a questionnaire with two questions that were used to partition each sub-group. The first group consisted of students that have varying levels of physics knowledge and the second group consisted of students that have varying levels of math knowledge. The conclusion of this study shows all subsets of students on average showed learning improvement from NG, with the least exposure to physics demonstrating the highest NG score and those with the lowest level math background showing the lowest NG scores. However, learning gains do not seem to correlate with physics exposure but may correlate with math preparation. We saw no advantage to the subgroup with no prior exposure to physics on NG when the pretest scores were considered nor between subsets within each set of questions. We did see a statistically significant difference for the subgroup with the lowest math background, but only seven out of 330 students identified under this category.