Ask a Librarian

Threre are lots of ways to contact a librarian. Choose what works best for you.

HOURS TODAY

10:00 am - 3:00 pm

Reference Desk

CONTACT US BY PHONE

(802) 656-2022

Voice

(802) 503-1703

Text

MAKE AN APPOINTMENT OR EMAIL A QUESTION

Schedule an Appointment

Meet with a librarian or subject specialist for in-depth help.

Email a Librarian

Submit a question for reply by e-mail.

WANT TO TALK TO SOMEONE RIGHT AWAY?

Library Hours for Thursday, March 28th

All of the hours for today can be found below. We look forward to seeing you in the library.
HOURS TODAY
8:00 am - 12:00 am
MAIN LIBRARY

SEE ALL LIBRARY HOURS
WITHIN HOWE LIBRARY

MapsM-Th by appointment, email govdocs@uvm.edu

Media Services8:00 am - 7:00 pm

Reference Desk10:00 am - 3:00 pm

OTHER DEPARTMENTS

Special Collections10:00 am - 6:00 pm

Dana Health Sciences Library7:30 am - 11:00 pm

 

CATQuest

Search the UVM Libraries' collections

UVM Theses and Dissertations

Browse by Department
Format:
Online
Author:
Clark, Eric Michael
Dept./Program:
Complex Systems and Data Science
Year:
2019
Degree:
Ph.D.
Abstract:
Twitter, a popular social media outlet, has evolved into a vast source of linguistic data, rich with opinion, sentiment, and discussion. We mined data from several public Twitter endpoints to identify content relevant to healthcare providers and public health regulatory professionals. We began by compiling content related to electronic nicotine delivery systems (or e-cigarettes) as these had become popular alternatives to tobacco products. There was an apparent need to remove high frequency tweeting entities, called bots, that would spam messages, advertisements, and fabricate testimonials. Algorithms were constructed using natural language processing and machine learning to sift human responses from automated accounts with high degrees of accuracy. We found the average hyperlink per tweet, the average character dissimilarity between each individual's content, as well as the rate of introduction of unique words were valuable attributes in identifying automated accounts. We performed a 10-fold Cross Validation and measured performance of each set of tweet features, at various bin sizes, the best of which performed with 97% accuracy. These methods were used to isolate automated content related to the advertising of electronic cigarettes. A rich taxonomy of automated entities, including robots, cyborgs, and spammers, each with different measurable linguistic features were categorized. Electronic cigarette related posts were classified as automated or organic and content was investigated with a hedonometric sentiment analysis. The overwhelming majority ([almost equal to] 80%) were automated, many of which were commercial in nature. Others used false testimonials that were sent directly to individuals as a personalized form of targeted marketing. Many tweets advertised nicotine vaporizer fluid (or e-liquid) in various "kid-friendly" flavors including 'Fudge Brownie', 'Hot Chocolate', 'Circus Cotton Candy' along with every imaginable flavor of fruit, which were long ago banned for traditional tobacco products. Others offered free trials, as well as incentives to retweet and spread the post among their own network. Free prize giveaways were also hosted whose raffle tickets were issued for sharing their tweet. Due to the large youth presence on the public social media platform, this was evidence that the marketing of electronic cigarettes needed considerable regulation. Twitter has since officially banned all electronic cigarette advertising on their platform. Social media has the capacity to afford the healthcare industry with valuable feedback from patients who reveal and express their medical decision-making process, as well as self-reported quality of life indicators both during and post treatment. We have studied several active cancer patient populations, discussing their experiences with the disease as well as survivor-ship. We experimented with a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) as well as logistic regression to classify tweets as patient related. This led to a sample of 845 breast cancer survivor accounts to study, over 16 months. We found positive sentiments regarding patient treatment, raising support, and spreading awareness. A large portion of negative sentiments were shared regarding political legislation that could result in loss of coverage of their healthcare. We refer to these online public testimonies as "Invisible Patient Reported Outcomes" (iPROs), because they carry relevant indicators, yet are difficult to capture by conventional means of self-reporting. Our methods can be readily applied interdisciplinary to obtain insights into a particular group of public opinions. Capturing iPROs and public sentiments from online communication can help inform healthcare professionals and regulators, leading to more connected and personalized treatment regimens. Social listening can provide valuable insights into public health surveillance strategies.