Ask a Librarian

Threre are lots of ways to contact a librarian. Choose what works best for you.

HOURS TODAY

10:00 am - 3:00 pm

Reference Desk

CONTACT US BY PHONE

(802) 656-2022

Voice

(802) 503-1703

Text

MAKE AN APPOINTMENT OR EMAIL A QUESTION

Schedule an Appointment

Meet with a librarian or subject specialist for in-depth help.

Email a Librarian

Submit a question for reply by e-mail.

WANT TO TALK TO SOMEONE RIGHT AWAY?

Library Hours for Thursday, April 25th

All of the hours for today can be found below. We look forward to seeing you in the library.
HOURS TODAY
8:00 am - 12:00 am
MAIN LIBRARY

SEE ALL LIBRARY HOURS
WITHIN HOWE LIBRARY

MapsM-Th by appointment, email govdocs@uvm.edu

Media Services8:00 am - 7:00 pm

Reference Desk10:00 am - 3:00 pm

OTHER DEPARTMENTS

Special Collections10:00 am - 6:00 pm

Dana Health Sciences Library7:30 am - 11:00 pm

 

CATQuest

Search the UVM Libraries' collections

UVM Theses and Dissertations

Browse by Department
Format:
Print
Author:
Lussier, Jennifer Plebani
Dept./Program:
Psychology
Year:
2004
Degree:
Ph. D.
Abstract:
There is ample clinical evidence in smoking cessation that relapse risk decreases as abstinence duration increases. However, such clinical results are correlational in nature. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to bring abstinence under experimental control and to test the influence of abstinence duration on relapse risk. Subjects were 63 adult smokers not currently trying to quit. Subjects were randomized into one of three conditions: 14-day contingent (14C), 7-day contingent (7C), and 1-day contingent (IC). Smoking status was assessed 3x/day for 14 consecutive days, with abstinence operationalized as breath CO 4ppm. In the 14C condition, monetary payment was abstinence-contingent for all 14 days; in the 7C condition, payment was non-contingent for Days 1-7 and abstinence-contingent for Days 8-14; in the 1 C condition, payment was non-contingent for Days 1-13 and abstinence-contingent for Day 14. After abstinence monitoring concluded on Day 14, all subjects completed a three-hour laboratory challenge session wherein relapse risk was modeled using a discrete-trial choice procedure. During this session, subjects made a maximum of 20 exclusive choices between receiving two puffs on a cigarette of their preferred brand or receiving money ($.25/choice). Abstinence was successfully manipulated, as there were almost no instances of abstinence when payment was non-contingent, while 99% of specimens met the abstinence criterion during contingent periods. During the challenge session, 19% (l4C), 57% (7C) and 62% (lC) of subjects chose to smoke ( 2(2) = 9.33, P = .01). Choices made by those in the 14C condition differed significantly from both the 7C ( 2 (1) = 6.46, P = .01) and lC ( 2 (1) = 8.00, P = .005) conditions, but the 7C and lC conditions did not differ significantly ( 2 (1) = 0.10, P = .75). These results provide experimental evidence that increasing the duration of abstinence decreases the probability of choosing smoking over alternative reinforcers, suggesting a causal role for prior abstinence in decreasing relapse risk.